COM271, Week 11

Writing for the Web

Syllabus | Table of Pages | Assignments | References and Useful Links

The World Wide Web is familiar to all of us. As a medium for communication, it is without par for its usefulness in commerce, personal communication, education, and entertainment. Yet the web as we know it—a mix of text , images, and multimedia—has only existed relatively recently, since the first graphical browsers came on line in 1992; for the current generation of undergraduates, there has always been a web. Augmented by steadily decreasing prices and increasing computer power in the home computer industry, the web is ubiquitous; indeed, it is difficult to imagine the world before the web.

For writers of scientific and technical material, there are myriad opportunities to write for publication to the web. Each of the billions of pages posted on servers, located all around the world, has a potential readership unimagined in prior human history. So what are you waiting for? The planet is waiting to hear from you.

Technology for Producing Web Pages

As we sit at our computers, we interact with other computers on the web, all connected by the electronic internet. We do not need to know how it works; we merely acknowledge that it does. We don't need to know much to get started, just enough to start a browser, to click a mouse, or to type in a web address, something millions have learned to do without ever taking a single course of instruction. But here, we are speaking as though the world of the web were all about consuming web pages.

There is, of course, another side of the web, the world of producing web pages, and it isn't that difficult to become a producer (web developer). You already have all of the tools that you need to get started

If you are interested in learning more about producing web pages, see COM271. If you want to learn more about web pages that use PHP and MySQL databases, see COM372. Both courses are taught by Dr. Logan.

Writing for the Web

Although the web is an ubiquitous and relatively cheap method for all kinds of writing, there are relatively few things written about writing for the web (even on the web!). The best texts for thinking about web writing from the perspective of meeting audience needs are probably the older (1999) Designing Web Usability, by Jakob Nielsen, or the more recent (2007) Letting Go of the Words: Writing Web Content That Works, by Janice Redish.

Both Nielsen and Redish remind us that the web reader is driven by a search for content, and that web pages should be designed for access to that content. The term user is common, and useful in differentiating between people as they seek content for particular purposes on the web from the same people as they consume writing for leisure or for uses that are not as characteristically driven and impatient as the reading experience typically is on the web.

Mindful of the web user, Nielsen suggests three guidelines for writing

Based on studies of people using the web, Nielsen advises, "Keep your text short."

"Research has shown that reading from computer screens is about 25 percent slower than reading from paper. Even users who don't know about this human-factors research usually say that they feel unpleasant when reading online text. As a result, people don't want to read a lot of text from computer screens. Therefore, you should write 50 percent less text—not just 25 percent less—because it's not only a matter of reading speed but also a matter of feeling good. We also know that users don't like to scroll: One more reason to keep pages short.

Perhaps the best illustration of the concise writing that Nielsen urges us to produce is his table analyzing how three techniques can improve user ratings of text. The three techniques are to use concise text, to use a scannable layout, and to adopt objective language. Here is Nielsen's table:

Site Version Sample Paragraph Usabilty Improvement
(Relative to
Control )
Promotional writing (control condition)
Uses the "market-ese" found on many commercial websites

Nebraska is filled with internationally recognized attractions that draw large crowds of people every year without fail. In 1996, some of the more popular places were Fort Robinson State Park (355,00 visitors), Scotts Bluff National Monument (132,166), Arbor Lodge State Historical Park & Museum (100,000), Carhenge (86,598), Stuhr Museum of the Prairie Pioneer (60,002), and Buffalo Bill Ranch State Historical Park (28,446).

0% better (this was the control condition)
Concise text
About half the word count as the control condition

In 1996, six of the best-attended attractions in Nebraska were Fort Robinson State Park, Scotts Bluff National Monument, Arbor Lodge State Historical Park & Museum, Carhenge, Stuhr Museum of the Prairie Pioneer, and Buffalo Bill Ranch State Historical Park.

58% better
Scannable layout
Uses the same text as the control condition in a layout that facilitate scanning

Nebraska is filled with internationally recognized attractions that draw large crowds of people every year without fail. In 1996, some of the more popular places were:

  • Fort Robinson State Park (355,00 visitors)
  • Scotts Bluff National Monument (132,166)
  • Arbor Lodge State Historical Park & Museum (100,000)
  • Carhenge (86,598)
  • Stuhr Museum of the Prairie Pioneer (60,002)
  • Buffalo Bill Ranch State Historical Park (28,446)
47% better
Objective language
Uses neutral rather than subjective, boastful, or exaggerated language (otherwise, the same as the control condition

Nebraska has several attractions. In 1996, some of the most-visited places were Fort Robinson State Park (355,00 visitors), Scotts Bluff National Monument (132,166), Arbor Lodge State Historical Park & Museum (100,000), Carhenge (86,598), Stuhr Museum of the Prairie Pioneer (60,002), and Buffalo Bill Ranch State Historical Park (28,446).

27% better
Combined version
Uses all three improvements in writing style: concise text, scannable layout, and orjective language

In 1996, six of the most-visited places in Nebraska were:

  • Fort Robinson State Park
  • Scotts Bluff National Monument
  • Arbor Lodge State Historical Park & Museum
  • Carhenge
  • Stuhr Museum of the Prairie Pioneer
  • Buffalo Bill Ranch State Historical Park
124% better

References